Lacks, a then 31-year old African-American mother of five from Baltimore, Maryland, found herself at the center of medical history on her death bed at Johns Hopkins Hospital, when upon being treated unsuccessfully for cervical cancer, her cells were taken, tested, and multiplied for scientific advancement all without her knowledge, the knowledge of her family and, most shockingly, without any compensation for her remaining survivors; compensation that still has not been received.
Just as swiftly as Lacks was making history, she was also being erased from it by doctors who in 1951 changed her name to Helen Lane to hide her identity and then used the first two initials of that first and last name to identify her cells. And that's where Lacks' story ended for many, until a young freelance, science writer--Rebecca Skloot--heard of the immortal HeLa cell line in a biology class and was ignited to learn all she could about Lacks, in an attempt to bring her story out of the darkness of lab rooms and into the spotlight for all the world to know. Thus, the biography "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" hit bookshelves with rave reviews in 2010, stayed on the New York Times best sellers list for six years, and was re-birthed on the television screen this past Saturday.
This is why Wolfe's adaption at a mere :95 minutes could not begin to do Lacks or her family's story the justice it continues to deserve. As are many of us, Lacks' children and relatives are both colorful and complex, in having to live in the shadow of their mother's enormous legacy yet without receiving any true acknowledgment of her life. Though Lacks physically left them over half a century ago, the concept of her "living" on for eternity is as hard for them to grasp as it literally sounds. However, on screen, the portrayal of these offspring feel rushed and one-dimensional, without much feeling or depth to unveil the pain they bore and continue to bear.
Further, Oprah in the leading role as Lacks' troubled, youngest daughter struggling with bipolar disorder, while uncovering the mystery of her mother's immortality, is both a blessing and a curse: a blessing as her name alone most likely drew many to the HBO adaptation where many possibly first learned of Lacks, but a curse in that, with a persona as large as Oprah's, it distracts from the real character: Lacks' story itself. There's not much Oprah has not or can not do well, but perhaps a lesser or unknown actress would have allowed all the space that was needed for Lacks' story to soar on screen, while allowing a newcomer's career to set sail as well. Furthermore, Wolfe's adaption largely tells Deborah's story and, while rightfully needing to be told as well, it somehow continues to leave Lacks' story as a secondary character yet again--much like the secondary character she's always played to her own immortality.
HeLa Cells |
Photo Credits: N/A
Never read the book, but am told its a must read as you point out. Could not agree more with Oprah being both a gift/curse to this story being adapted for television. As it neared the end, it seemed like O was channeling "The Color Purple" too much. I wanted a bit more than the flashbacks about Herietta Lacks, and while I appreciated them for showing her humanity, focusing on the children and their relationship with the 'white savior' took away from where the story should have been centered.
ReplyDelete